An old Ethereum address transferred 6,369 ETH to Kraken after acquiring these tokens for around $14 nine years ago. Their value now reaches nearly $16 million, but the announced yield of 17,786% will only really be received if the assets are sold.
In brief
- An Ethereum whale transferred 6,369 ETH to Kraken, worth close to $16 million.
- Bought around 14 dollars nine years ago, these ETH display a potential capital gain of 17,786%.
- This transfer does not necessarily mean that the investor has sold his cryptocurrencies and cashed out his gains.
- The movements of these historical holders are attracting attention, but their impact on the price of Ethereum remains limited at this stage.
The 6369 ETH were transferred to Kraken
The wallet tracked by Lookonchain deposited 6,369 ETH on the Kraken platform on October 14. At the time of the transfer, the tokens were worth approximately $15.95 million, based on a price close to $2,504 per ether.
The address allegedly acquired these ETH nine years ago for an average price of just $14. The initial cost of the position can therefore be estimated at approximately $89,166.
The ratio between current value and starting capital reaches almost 179. After deducting the initial investment, the potential capital gain approaches $15.86 million, or approximately 17786%.
This calculation shows the extent of Ethereum’s appreciation since 2017. However, it depends on two assumptions: the address actually bought the tokens at the indicated price and their owner can sell them close to the price used for the estimate.
THE public data of the blockchain allow transfers between wallets to be tracked. They do not always positively identify the person, company or group that controls an address.
A deposit on an exchange does not prove a sale
Sending tokens to a centralized platform is usually a potential sell signal. Investors often transfer their cryptos to an exchange to convert them into dollars, stablecoins or other assets.
However, this operation does not demonstrate that the 6369 ETH have already been sold. Their holder can keep them on Kraken, use them as collateral, place them in staking or execute an over-the-counter transaction.
The yield of 17786% therefore remains theoretical as long as no sale is visible or confirmed. If the investor gradually sells his ETH at a lower price, his final gain will be lower. An additional increase would have the opposite effect.
The figure also does not take into account any transaction fees, Kraken commissions and taxes applicable to the holder. These costs would remain low compared to the added value, but they prevent the estimate from being considered as a net benefit.
It is therefore appropriate to speak of potential gain or latent capital gain at the time of deposit, and not of a profit definitively received.
Early ETH Holders Take Profits
This transaction joins several movements observed among former Ethereum investors. At the end of September, another address inactive for almost nine years began selling a position acquired in 2017.
This wallet had purchased 3,000 ETH at an average price of $18.80, for an initial investment of $56,500. He then sold 2,000 tokens around $3,096 on average and kept the remaining 1,000 ETH.
In January, an address that had been inactive for nine years also transferred 135,284 ETH to Gemini. These tokens, accumulated around $70 to $90, were worth nearly $397 million when they moved.
These sales do not necessarily constitute a collective bearish signal. Historical holders can secure part of their gains after several years without calling into question their confidence in the network.
Their very low acquisition price also allows them to sell with a significant capital gain, even when ETH is very far from its historic peak.
Selling pressure that the market must absorb
Ethereum is trading around $2,500 after briefly touching near $2,400 this week. The token remains weakened by the exits of certain ETFs, the decline in the ETH/BTC ratio and general caution on risky assets.
A sale of 6369 ETH represents approximately 0.005% of the network’s total supply. This volume remains modest on the scale of Ethereum and should not, on its own, permanently change the price.
The impact depends mainly on the method used. An immediate sale on the order book exerts more pressure than a split transaction or negotiated over-the-counter with an institutional buyer.
Whale movements attract attention because they can signal a change in behavior among long-term holders. However, a single portfolio is not enough to establish a general trend.
Above all, this transaction illustrates the performance achieved by certain early investors. It also recalls an essential nuance: the blockchain confirms the movement of ETH, but not the identity of their owner nor the definitive realization of the announced gain.
Maximize your Tremplin.io experience with our ‘Read to Earn’ program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
