In the legal war between the SEC and Kraken, an unexpected front of state attorneys general has just risen against the stock market watchdog. Analysis of an alliance that could reshuffle the cards of the crypto regulatory framework.
A rare challenge to the authority of the SEC
Seeing prosecutors challenge the SEC head-on is an extremely rare event. These Republican prosecutors chose to challenge the agency’s overall approach to the legal characterization of crypto particularly in the Kraken trial.
They believe that the SEC goes too far by systematically assimilating cryptos to financial securities. According to them, this extensive interpretation threatens the balance of the regulatory framework and the interests of consumers.
States also believe that their own legal protections have historically filled federal gaps. They do not want to see their role diminished by SEC encroachment under the guise of investor protection.
Political controversy escalates for crypto
This positioning marks a new stage in the growing controversy around the SEC’s regulatory scope in the crypto sphere.
The agency and its president Gary Gensler are criticized for their intransigence and declared hostility towards crypto. Some crypto political figures have called the action against Kraken “illegal”.
Political pressure is therefore growing stronger, to the point that some are talking about a reduction in the SEC’s budgetary resources if it does not change its approach.
Towards a rebalancing of the balance of power?
This rebelliousness of the States could potentially lead in the long term to a rebalancing in favor of local jurisdictions.
Indeed, crypto consumer protections provided by state laws are often stricter than the federal framework. It would therefore be paradoxical to see the SEC impose its extensive conception of stock exchange laws to the detriment of local safeguards.
Above all, this dispute highlights the deep legal debate on the adequate qualification of crypto-assets.
Ultimately, this arm wrestling could lead to a welcome clarification of the regulatory framework applicable to cryptos.
Political and judicial pressure could force the SEC to review its current doctrine, considered too broad. A more precise definition would allow players to develop without fear of being improperly assimilated to securities.
Although symbolic at this stage, the initiative of these state attorneys general undoubtedly marks a turning point. It paves the way for a progressive clarification of the legal framework applicable to the new asset class of cryptos. Far from being anecdotal, this legal-political standoff could ultimately lead to the establishment of a more harmonious balance between the federal powers of the SEC and local protections for crypto consumers.
Maximize your Tremplin.io experience with our ‘Read to Earn’ program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
