Donald Trump puts his flagship budgetary law!

On the eve of July 4, the US Congress adopted one of the most radical budgetary texts in the modern era. Worn by Donald Trump, this law redesigns the economic priorities of the United States with massive tax cuts, social cups and a sharp debt. The vote, torn off despite republican fractures, marks a strategic turning point in the post-Biden era. More than a simple budget, it is a political declaration that rebatts the cards of power and revives ideological tensions in Washington.

High -tension adoption at Congress

Donald Trump's budgetary law, a source of strong tensions with Musk, was officially approved by 218 votes against 214 by the House of Representatives this Thursday, July 3, after an already difficult vote in the Senate two days earlier.

This legislative victory, described as “victory” by the White House on X, marks a political turning point for the American president, determined to impose his economic vision before the national holiday.

“This text brings together all the policies on which the president campaigned and for which the Americans voted on November 5,” said declared Karoline Leavitt, spokesperson for the executive. In a tense hemicycle, some republican parliamentarians have chanted “USA, USA, USA!” »» At the end of the vote, illustrating a militant fervor despite the internal fractures.

To achieve this result, the executive had to face strong resistance, including in the Republican camp. Several conservative elected officials denounced the extent of the public debt caused by the text. Faced with this blockage, a series of political maneuvers have been deployed:

• Donald Trump intervened personally, and has published On Truth Social: “Maga is not happy, and it costs you voices”;
• He made calls in the night to try to convince the refractory;
• The president of the room, Mike Johnson, led behind the scenes with the direct help of the White House;
• The vote, initially scheduled for Wednesday, was delayed following a nine -hour speech (historic record) pronounced by Hakeem Jeffries, chief of the Democrats in the House;
• Only two Republicans voted against, which made it possible to maintain a fragile majority with eight seats.

Between tax gifts and social cuts

Behind the intense parliamentary battle, it is the very content of the budgetary bill that triggers a wave of indignation among opponents and growing concern among economists and certain business leaders such as Elon Musk.

Presented as the “Large and beautiful law” By Donald Trump, this reform includes in particular the extension of the massive tax credits set up during its first mandate, as well as the abolition of taxation on tips, a campaign promise that has become reality. In addition, there are military expenses revised upwards and a strengthening of the budget intended for the fight against immigration.

However, this orientation is accompanied by significant cuts in social programs, which feed democratic anger. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the text should increase the debt of more than $ 3,400 billion by 2034.

To partially compensate for this deficit, the Republicans provide for a drastic reduction in Medicaid, a vital program for millions of Americans with modest income, as well as a significant drop in the SNAP program, the main food aid of the country.

Measures which, according to several analyzes, will especially benefit “To the wealthiest households”while millions of others could lose their health coverage or access to a subsidized diet.

These choices cause virulent reactions in the Democratic camp. Hakeem Jeffries denounced a “A repugnant monstrosity that will make ordinary Americans suffer”while Gavin Newsom, governor of California, said that “17 million people have just lost their health insurance”.

Former President Joe Bidre has launched a law “Not only irresponsible, but cruel”criticizing the “Large tax cuts for billionaires”. If this reform is part of a strategy of stimulating the economy via the decline in taxation, its human and financial cost could fuel an even more marked political polarization as the next electoral deadlines approaches.

This historic budgetary text, tailor -made for the vision of a strong America and delendetted by growth, risks producing contrasting effects. While the financial markets and economic circles remain awaiting a quantified impact, the social and political tensions it generates are already palpable. The reform could become a marker of the new Trump era, but also a major crystallization point for the opposition, because some people think that it could ruin US finances.