The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) could soon relax its strict rules on cryptos! An expected decision, after the explosion of stablecoins. This revision marks a turning point for the integration of digital assets into traditional finance, between innovation and regulatory prudence.
In brief
- The Basel Committee is considering relaxing its strict rules on cryptos, driven by the rise of stablecoins and pressure from banks.
- Stablecoins, now regulated, could benefit from prudential treatment distinct from bitcoin, accelerating their banking adoption.
- 2026 could mark a turning point: integration of cryptos into traditional financial services or fragmentation of the market.
Global banks towards accelerated adoption of cryptos: the Basel Committee under pressure
The Basel Committee's current rules, established in 2022, impose such high capital requirements on banks that they discourage significant exposure to cryptos. However, the growth of stablecoins, now regulated in the United States by the GENIUS Act, has revealed the limits of this framework. These assets, backed by liquid reserves, are perceived as less risky than bitcoin or ethereum. But they remain subject to the same constraints.
A revision of crypto guidelines by the Basel Committee is underway, driven by banks and regulators. Indeed, the latter wish to avoid a competitive disadvantage against fintechs and crypto platforms. If the rules are relaxed, financial institutions could finally integrate crypto-assets into their services. This, subject to strict guarantees.
This development reflects a paradigm shift. In fact, crypto is no longer considered a threat, but an opportunity to be managed.
Stablecoins: the trigger for more nuanced regulation
Stablecoins have transformed the financial landscape by offering fast, inexpensive and stable transactions, unlike BTC. Their massive adoption, particularly for cross-border payments, has forced crypto regulators to reconsider their approach. In the United States, the GENIUS Act has already established a framework for their use, while the European Union and the United Kingdom are studying similar solutions.
The Basel Committee must now decide: should we maintain uniform regulation for all cryptos? Or distinguish stablecoins, which are less risky, from speculative assets like BTC. Banks are pleading for a differentiated approach, arguing that stablecoins, backed by reserves in dollars or euros, deserve lighter prudential treatment.
This distinction could accelerate their adoption by financial institutions, while limiting the systemic risks associated with more volatile cryptos.
2026, a decisive year: what impacts for crypto investors?
If the Basel Committee relaxes its rules, banks could offer products combining stablecoins and cryptos like bitcoin. The first would be used for payments and liquidity. While the second would be integrated as a reserve or investment asset, via ETFs or dedicated funds. Such a development would democratize access to cryptocurrencies for institutional and individual clients.
Conversely, maintaining strict rules would risk marginalizing traditional banks, to the benefit of specialized players. Crypto investors could then turn to more welcoming jurisdictions, such as Singapore or Dubai, accentuating the fragmentation of the market.
The Basel Committee's review of the rules could well mark a turning point for crypto adoption by banks. Between opportunities for innovation and regulatory challenges that weaken MiCA rules, a question persists: will this development be enough to meet market expectations, or will it only postpone the real challenges of the crypto revolution?
Maximize your Tremplin.io experience with our 'Read to Earn' program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
