The tokenization of financial assets promises to disrupt traditional finance, but tensions between innovation and regulation are reaching a critical point. Nasdaq wants to accelerate the adoption of tokenized securities, while Ondo Finance, a giant in the sector, demands more transparency. Who is right in this fight for the future of crypto markets?
In brief
- Nasdaq proposes to integrate tokenized securities to modernize the markets, but its lack of details on the settlement process draws criticism.
- Ondo Finance demands more transparency from Nasdaq, denouncing an unfair competitive advantage and a risk of market centralization.
- The SEC's decision could shape the future of tokenization, between accelerated adoption or a stricter regulatory framework to protect investors.
Nasdaq's proposal for the tokenization of securities
Nasdaq has submitted a proposal to the SEC to integrate tokenized securities, a major step to modernize financial markets. The objective? Allow investors to trade stocks and ETFs as tokens, reducing costs and speeding up transactions. According to Nasdaq, this innovation could democratize access to financial assets while maintaining traditional protections.
However, questions persist. The proposal relies on the Depository Trust Company (DTC) for settlement of transactions, but the technical details remain unclear. Some experts fear increased centralization, where a few players would dominate the market. In his letter to SEC, Nasdaq ensures that its approach complies with existing rules. But, critics like Ondo Finance have doubts.
Ondo Finance sounds the alarm: transparency and fairness in question
Ondo Finance, leader in real asset tokenization, sent a letter to the SEC to demand more clarity on Nasdaq proposal. According to Ondo, the lack of public details on the role of DTC creates an imbalance: only a few players would have access to crucial information, distorting competition. The company advocates for open collaboration and transparent standards before any validation.
This opposition is not surprising. Ondo, which manages more than $600 million in tokenized assets, champions a decentralized and accessible ecosystem. For them, the Nasdaq's rush could harm the entire sector. Other players, such as BlackRock and Fidelity, are watching carefully, aware that this decision could influence their own tokenization projects.
Tokenization of assets: towards a stricter regulatory framework or a financial wild west?
The SEC plays a key role in this debate. Its approach will determine whether the tokenization of securities will be strictly regulated or left to the initiative of private actors. Approval too quickly could open the door to abuse, while rejection would hamper innovation. While European regulators such as the AMF in France are adopting a cautious stance on the tokenization of traditional assets by requiring reinforced guarantees, bitcoin is a reminder that decentralization remains the only model resistant to any institutional interference.
Several scenarios are possible. If the SEC validates Nasdaq's proposal, other exchanges could follow, accelerating global adoption. Conversely, a rejection or major modifications could slow down the movement, in favor of more decentralized solutions, such as those supported by Ondo Finance. Tokenization is inevitable, but its future will depend on the ability to strike a balance between innovation and investor protection.
The confrontation between Ondo Finance and Nasdaq illustrates the challenges of tokenization: innovating without sacrificing transparency. However, a question persists: will the finance of tomorrow be more open or controlled by a handful of actors? And you, would you be ready to invest in tokenized securities without clear guarantees?
Maximize your Tremplin.io experience with our 'Read to Earn' program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
