Does Openai really make a rear machine, or does it play the card of absolute transparency? The structure turnaround announced in early May questions. Are the accusations of greed launched by Elon Musk against Sam Altman here find an echo, or an implacable denial? Far from the slogans, this moult of Openai deserves to be examined. Not in media foam, but in the mechanics of its governance. Behind the code, convictions?
In short
- Openai abandons its for-production model for the benefit of a Benefit Corporation audience controlled by the non-production.
- Sam Altman claims to want to democratize AI while raising massive capital for its development.
- Elon Musk accuses OpenAi of betrayal, once demanding total control or a fusion with Tesla.
The big way back to basics: Openai chooses the PBC
Openai, now valued at $ 300 billion, decided to Do not become a completely capitalist company. Exit the purely for-production model. Place A PBC – Public Benefit Corporation – Controlled by the mother association. This change is not cosmetic. It ends an era of ambiguity where The company oscillated between philanthropic ambition and capital pressure.
In A letter dated May 2025Sam Altman sums up this decision as well:
Openai is today a non -profit organization, and it will remain so.
This clarity contrasts with 2024 turbulencewhen Openai maintained that a fortune turn was inevitable.
Reality was essential: To build an act, colossal sums must be lifted. Hundreds of billions, perhaps trillions. Altman specifies:
We want to put our tools in all hands. This requires gigantic resources.
The solution found? A PBC entity aligned with the association's missionbut open to investment. In other words, impact capitalism, but with structural safeguards. The choice of PBC format is not trivial: other laboratories like Anthropic or X.AI have already adopted it. Openai sells nothing. She changes her vehicle. And stays behind the wheel.
Musk vs Altman: Duel of AI models, Battle of visions
This reorganization is not an admission of weakness. It is above all a response calculated to a legal affront. At the beginning of 2024, Elon Musk – Co -founder of Openai – filed a complaint against Sam Altman. In his complaint, he accuses him of having ” handled Musk for co-founding a false non-profit association In order to transform it into a private company.
OPENAI, in a documented counterattack, reveals that Musk demanded total control of the entity or its merger with Tesla. A version of the facts confirmed internal emails : ” Tesla is the only way to compete with Google “Writing Musk.
When he can't get winning, He slams the door and founded XAI. The ego war became a war of models. One advocates the independence of a regulated AI. The other dream of a super-IA integrated into its industrial empire.
Openai chose the democratic path. Altman assumes it:
We want an AI that benefits everyone. It is not a utopia, it is a structure.
The message is clear: no individual, as rich as it is, should control such a powerful technology alone.
Faced with criticism, Openai does not back down. She strengthens her spine. And she writes it black on white.
A hybrid structure for XXL ambitions
Openai keeps the reins, but see his financial mechanics again. The capped profit structure is abandoned. From now on, Everyone will have actions. Simple, direct, readable. The non-professional remains in control, but also becomes a major shareholder.
This movement is accompanied by an objective of collective return. Altman is explicit:
We want our PBC to provide resources to the Mother Association to support democratic AI.
Some figures:
- OPENAI aims $ 12.7 billion in revenues in 2025;
- Objective 2026: $ 29.4 billion;
- 40 billion recently raised, valuation at $ 300 billion;
- Elon Musk contributed only $ 45 million to the initial non-proofit;
- PBC makes it possible to raise funds without giving in control.
This hybrid model Give OPENAI wings. It ends the untenable equation: exponential growth vs frozen ethics. Above all, it protects the integrity of the mission. With this evolution, Openai does not deny its origins. It adapts to the reality of a global race for Act. And she asserts her difference, where others have already given in to the all-production.
Openai may never have been so faithful to his name. It opens, structure, and preserves. But all of this has a cost. In an internal note recently revealed, Altman reports an absurd truth: saying “thank you” to Chatgpt consumes money. On a large scale, this digital politeness costs a fortune.
Maximize your Cointribne experience with our 'Read to Earn' program! For each article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start accumulating advantages.
