Ethereum reserves on exchanges continue to melt, while an ever-increasing portion of the supply remains tied up in staking. This dual dynamic gradually tightens the liquidity available on the market and reinforces the scenario of a supply squeeze, a supply shock likely to weigh on price formation. While ETH tries to stay around $1,900, on-chain data reveals a fundamental development that could redefine the balance between buyers and sellers in the coming weeks.
In brief
- The ETH staking rate reaches a peak of 33.6%, tying up a growing portion of the money supply outside of trading channels.
- ETH reserves on centralized platforms dropped to 15.1 million ETH, driven by steady net withdrawals (~46,300 ETH).
- This contraction in liquidity persists both during periods of rising and falling prices, confirming a long-term withdrawal of liquidity.
- Scarcity alone is not enough to trigger a price surge; the market still lacks sustained spot demand and institutional inflows.
The mechanical drying up of Ethereum liquidity on the spot market
Metrics analysis on-chain confirms a structural and accelerated contraction in the supply of Ethereum immediately available for trading. Recent data published by CryptoQuant reveal several key indicators:
- The surge in ETH 2.0 staking: the staking rate has reached a new milestone to stand at around 33.6%, marking a spectacular progression compared to the 28% recorded at the start of 2025;
- The fall in reserves on exchanges: ETH reserves held across all centralized exchange platforms have suffered a drastic decline, going from a peak above 21 million ETH to around 15.1 million ETH;
- Negative net flows on platforms: recent net flows on exchanges remain negative at around -46,300 ETH, reflecting withdrawals which largely exceed deposits;
- Still Positive Inflows to Staking: Inflows to the staking protocol remain positive at around +62,200 ETH, although this pace is significantly below the episodic peaks seen earlier in the period.
This joint movement of withdrawal from platforms and orientation towards staking is not a simple short-term speculative fluctuation. The decline in reserves on exchanges has in fact continued uninterrupted through phases of price increases as well as during correction phases. According to CryptoQuant analysts, this persistence reflects a structural reduction in immediately accessible supply rather than a fleeting withdrawal cycle. The combined effect of these flows creates a fundamentally constructive signal for Ethereum’s medium-term supply profile. More tokens enter the staking contract while a smaller and smaller quantity remains parked on exchanges, restricting the mass of ETH awaiting sale on the secondary market.
The imperative of real demand
If the scarcity of tokens is incontestable on an accounting level, the price mechanics obey a more complex logic where the restriction of supply produces no effect without buying pressure. As CryptoQuant experts point out, “a simple reduction in supply is not enough to cause a price squeeze. To increase the price, we still need sustained demand on the spot market, more sustained network activity or incoming flows from institutional investors..
Despite a rebound in price towards $1,900, the market has not yet demonstrated the buying intensity necessary to convert this drop in liquidity into a decisive bullish breakout. The simple scarcity of tokens alone cannot guarantee a significant upward movement in the absence of an external catalyst to stimulate spot trading volume.
Analysis of network activity and institutional flows shows that buyer enthusiasm remains moderate at this stage. Even if the continued withdrawal of reserves provides a favorable base, reduced liquidity can increase volatility without setting a clear direction. Without the injection of fresh capital into the spot market or a renewed use of decentralized applications, the scarcity of the money supply in circulation risks remaining a passive factor, incapable of driving the market upwards on its own.
Critical thresholds
Short-term developments thus remain suspended from confirmation by the price of the reality of this drying up. Thus, the immediate bias remains moderately constructive as long as the draining of reserves from exchange platforms continues at the current pace. Analysts warn, however, that the theoretical realization of the supply shock will depend on strict technical crossings on the spot market: “a lasting rise in the price above $2,000 would reinforce the hypothesis of a supply squeeze, while a return of incoming flows to the exchange platforms would weaken it”.
The validation or refutation of the bullish scenario for Ethereum will therefore rely on the ability of the crypto price to exceed this psychological threshold or, conversely, on the detrimental return of deposit flows to exchange platforms.
If institutional investors or a resumption of application activity fuel spot demand, the low depth of the order book on exchanges could accelerate the rise in the price of Ether suddenly. Conversely, if demand remains sluggish or if incoming flows to exchange platforms regain the upper hand, the supply squeeze thesis will be reduced to a simple theoretical illusion.
Maximize your Tremplin.io experience with our ‘Read to Earn’ program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
